Say you're part of my generation, and those classy, spiffy looking little bottles of intriguing Zima dissapeared from store shelves just before you were old enough to (legally) find out for yourself just how unworthwhile they really were.
Sure, everyone said it was horrible, nasty crap. Sure, in all your years you've never heard anyone say one good thing about Zima (not even that one dude who had just the weirdest taste in drinks...) But now they're back, and dagnabbit you're well over 21 this time, with a bucket list and some hard-earned cash.
And partway into one bottle, yes, you too can now check one more item off that bucket list - that slight cringe on your face is your badge of honor: You finally know for yourself exactly why it was ridiculed and dissapeard for over a decade. And you too, can now join in on the ribbing. Mission accomplished.
But, shoot, what do you do with the rest of the five and a half bottles in that six-pack? It never did feel right to toss even the most vile booze down the drain. What a shame. What's a dude[ette] to do?
- 1/2 Bottle of chilled but still nasty, overly-sugary, slightly beer-ish, not-very-citrusy swill that because of "malt and citrus" sounds like it should kinda taste like a shandy except it really doesn't (aka, "Zima")
- However many shots of whatever proof vodka you choose. You're on your own here, but one word of advice: Go with the cheapest one you can find. It's a freaking mixed drink - it's not like you're gonna notice the difference. (Rum would likely work well too, athough it's not as cheap. Just make sure not to use a sweeter one like Parrot Bay, at least not for this recipe. The Zima has plenty of sweetness already.)
- Juice from 1/2 a lime (Roll the lime hard on a countertop before slicing it open - That'll make it a lot easier to extract all the juice. Some people suggest slightly heating it in a microwave, but I think rolling it is easier, much more fun, and words just as well.)
- Several leaves of fresh mint (Or a bunch if you really love mint)
- Three ice cubes
- Take your serving vessel (ie: "cup") and add the lime juice and mint leaves.
- Use a muddler to mash the mint leaves (Carefully! You don't want to chip the glass if the glass is...umm...glass). The releases the mint's minty flavor into the drink.
- Since nobody has a muddler, and most people don't even know what a "muddler" is, just use the handle of a knife or whatever else you have in your kitcken that looks like it'd be good for mashing mint leaves in a glass. (Hmm, maybe I should have mentioned this before step 2.)
- Add your vodka (Or rum. Or whatever.)
- Add ice.
- Fill the rest of the glass with (roughly) 1/2 bottle of Zima
- Serve. (That's fancy-talk for "Bottoms Up!")
- Swear to never buy Zima again. Until the next time they bring it back as a "Limited Release"...
For the past couple years, I've been a Verizon user with a deep seething hatred for Verizon. I won't get into why I despise them here, other than to say it's been for both real-world practical and ideological reasons. But, for various reasons also not worth getting into (such as other people on my group plan, and one particular catch involved in the "We'll pay your early termination fee" deals that's personally a show-stopper for me), and let's face it, there's no such thing as a good telecom company, I've been stuck until now.
I've been eyeing T-Mobile a lot lately. I'm not sure sure about the whole "uncarrier" moniker, but they do appear to be an improvement over Verizon in many ways. And from what I can tell, they seem the least offensive and questionable of all the options available here in the US.
However, as anyone who's looked into them knows, T-Mobile's famous Achilles heel has always been questionable service coverage. Aaaaannd...that leads straight down a rabbit hole: This year, T-Mobile's been saying a lot about their greatly improved network. Some users confirm it, some contradict it, and others just ramble about..."band 12"??? WTF is that??? Who even wants to know?!
After researching more and more, I think I've finally gotten a handle on just what is going on with T-Mobile's network lately. Here's what I've found out:
"If you haven't tried our network lately, you haven't tried it period." - Frequent T-Mobile tagline
Turns out, there's a lot of truth to that statement...depending on your phone. But back to that in a bit...
Ultimately, the key concept here is that there's two types of radio frequencies used by cellular carriers: Higher frequencies and lower frequencies.
Lower frequencies travel farther and do a good job of penetrating walls and buildings (See what FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said about this last year). But there's a downside: They can't handle quite as many people at the same time. So the carriers have to make up for that by building more cell towers. This works out perfectly for the larger carriers who can afford it. In fact, for many years, and up to at least as recently as one year ago, "AT&T and Verizon control nearly three-quarters of low-band spectrum in the US".
Higher frequencies can support more users doing more things at the same time. This makes it attractive to underdogs carriers like T-Mobile who use it because they can support more customers with fewer towers at a lower cost. But the downside is that higher frequencies don't travel as far, and have trouble penetrating walls and buildings. So, historically, T-Mobile has been making do with fewer towers, each with less range. This is why T-Mobile's network works great when you're in range (their higher frequencies can handle more people and more data), but also why actually getting a signal could be difficult (their higher frequencies, from fewer towers, don't travel as far or go through as many walls and buildings).
This past year, T-Mobile's been spending large amounts of money to do two things: First, they've been building new towers to help compensate for their signals not traveling as far as Verizon's. This gives them coverage across a much larger portion of land than before, and fills their coverage map with far more of their flagship pink. This is why some T-Mobile users, particularly ones in suburban areas, have been reporting their coverage has improved. (Although, rural areas are still lagging - albeit not by quite as much as before.) But, since high-frequency is still high-frequency, these additional towers alone don't do much to solve the problem of getting a good signal indoors, or around many large buildings. This is why other T-Mobile users, especially ones in urban areas, have been reporting they're still getting spotty coverage.
Addressing that is the second big thing T-Mobile has been working on recently. Early last year, they spent $3 billion buying a chunk of lower-frequency (700MHz) spectrum from Verizon, and have been bringing it live this year, especially over just these last few months, and they're continuing to utilize more of it even now. They also plan to buy even more (600MHz) at an FCC auction early next year.
This lower-frequency 700MHz range that T-Mobile bought from Verizon and has now been bringing live is what they're calling "Extended Range LTE". In more technical circles, this specific section of 700MHz is also known as "band 12".
But if T-Mobile now has all this new "works well indoors and through buildings" capability, why have some users been reporting they still get bad indoor coverage? They're probably on an older phone: Older phones are, well, older, and so don't support T-Mobile's new "band 12"/"700MHz"/"Extended Range LTE". For reference, here's the current list of phones which do support it. The list is also available here. (Unfortunately, that does exclude the phone I wanted, the Note 3. Damn. So long USB3 and hardware menu button :/ ). But it seems safe to expect all major current and upcoming phones to support it moving forward.
So, bottom line: T-Mobile is currently in the middle of a big shift improving their coverage. Some of this is already here, particularly in suburban areas, but some is still yet to come. The big caveat is that the improvements to indoor reception require a newer phone compatible with T-Mobile's new "band 12"/"700MHz"/"Extended Range LTE".
So apparently there's a big news story about a professional [American] Football player who's (gasp!) gay.
I could say "who the hell cares?", but that, frankly, goes without saying. Let's start congratulating people for being lefties! "Wow, you like sausage pizza better than pepperoni? You're sooo brave!"
If I were gay I'd be deeply insulted by all that patronizing congratulatory bullshit. It's not wonderful, it's a plain old fucking preference, dipshits, get over it. There's too goddamn many straights out there retarded enough to think they have to celebrate something in order to not hate it. Fucking morons.
So forget "He's gay? So the fuck what?", because there's a bigger question lingering here:
In an industry famous for male-exclusivity and locker room butt-slaps, this "news" is surprising...why exactly?
Leftover meals tend to be shunned as being mediocre at best. However, I'd argue most of the blame lies not with food being "leftover", but with its traditional reheating method: the microwave.
I love and use microwaves as much as anyone. Heck, probably more. For many things they do a perfectly adequate job. But for some foods, such as fish, or eggs, or most leftovers, microwaves will destroy edibility and are best avoided.
If you're a quick-food microwave addict like me, then next time you have leftovers, try reheating with the stove or the oven. For mere reheating (as opposed to preparing a full meal), it's not as much time and trouble as it would seem, and it makes a world of difference.
The rule for good leftovers: No microwave!
One small caveat: Cheese melts very poorly in the oven (it gets dry) unless there's a sauce or other liquid involved. Pizza in the oven? No problem. Enchiladas or French Onion Soup? Sure! Melt some cheese on tortilla chips? No, just use the microwave (and then stick to salad the rest of the day...)
Found this image rather amusing (from the PS3's "What's new" section).
Sooo...I guess the PlayStation 4 is being released from Taco Bell, not Sony. Gotta love awkward wording :)
(And yes, that is taken from an SD CRT. I know. Shaddup ;) )
That's right: As the latest stunt in Microsoft's groundbreaking new line of "practical jokes as a serious business strategy", Microsoft's upcoming third XBox is officially called "XBox One".
Naturally, I get the whole "What's in a name?" deal. Obviously the third XBox doesn't need to be called XBox 3. They can certainly call it whatever the hell they want. Like "Poop Box Hepatitis Supreme". But that doesn't mean certain names aren't colossally stupid. Case in point: The XBox One won't be released until later this year, and yet somehow, I already had an XBox 1 over ten years ago. Go figure.
Side note: I can't believe none of the game news outlets (from what I've seen) have even touched on this. I know it's just a name, but still, absurdity is absurdity.
I used to lament the passing of the days when game systems had cool names (Genesis, TurboGraphix 16, Jaguar). Now I just miss the days of generic names (GameCube, XBox). Right, Nintendo Weeyu?